| With Fulham announcing that
from the end of the 2002-03 season their Ladies team will no longer be
full-time professionals and will revert to semi-professional status, the
future of the Women's game in England has had a dark cloud cast over it.
With figures for the most recent
financial year showing Fulham lost £23.3 million - that's an increase
of £9.4 million from the previous year - cuts had to be made. The fact
tat they spent £30 million on six players shows that the spending and
high wages for the Premiership team had to stop somewhere and despite
cuts in the money available to the first team, the major snip has been
in the women's set-up. The London Evening Standard estimated that
it cost £500,000 to run the Fulham Ladies side each season, which in
terms of Ladies football is big money. They turned professional
three years ago in a blaze of glory and dragged Arsenal Ladies into
semi-professionalism, with Doncaster Belles, Leeds and Bristol Rovers
following them. However, the lack of positive action by the Football
Association to develop a professional Women's set-up in this country has
lead to Mohamed Al-fayed having to chop the funds to the Cottagers'
Ladies team.
Starting in 1993 with a place in Greater
London Women's Regional Division Four and playing their games on Hackney
Marshes, Fulham won five promotions in seven years, but the way they
shot up the Leagues in the last two has taken the game by storm.
A recent article in "Four Four
Two" magazine revealed that Women's Premier League side Birmingham
City have players paying £4 a week to play the game compared with
Fulham's squad believed to be on anything from £15,000 to £50,000 a
year. The inequality is clear to see and perhaps like the men's
Premier League, the bubble had to burst. The article claims that
Al-Fayed put £3 million in over a period of three years, which is to
end in May 2003. So he is literally saying that the well is now
dry. The date was significant as that was when the FA had aimed to
have a professional league started in England, which has not come
about. It appears that the financial backing is not there for such
an organisation and the current structure will stay in place for the
time being.
Fulham are not the only club who put
serious funding into their Ladies team. Figures quoted by the
magazine are Leeds United (£80,000 per annum), a similar amount
invested by Charlton and Arsenal players getting appearance money and
sponsorship from the men's team. But what do the teams have to
look forward to ?
The way that football is approached in
America is completely different and that is why several of the top
players in the UK have gone to USA to find their fortune and fame.
There is a professional league there and the Americans find that women's
football is a viable enough to sustain an eight team professional league
now entering it's third season. One thing has hugely helped them
and that was the USA ladies winning the 1999 World Cup. The
exposure that gave the women's game in America was massive. In
front of their countrymen and women in the nation where 'soccer' was
always a "kick in the grass", the game took off.
Strangely enough, although the men have been in the World Cup finals, it
is the success of the women that has really stolen the limelight and
that could be down to one in particular ... Mia Hamm.
Now a globally recognised name, Hamm has
dragged the sport into one of the most popular in the States with
millions of girls taking up the game. It is a similar picture in
the England with FA figures claiming 1.4 million girls under 15 play in
some sort of organised match each week, but it appears that the step to
a professional set-up here lacks the push that the Americans put behind
their league.
Why is that ? After all women's
football has been around in the country since 1895, when the first
women's match was recorded. Most notably, the Ladies came to the
fore during World War I, when Dick Kerr's Ladies drew big crowds during
the conflict to raise £70,000 for charities and military
hospitals. The team were so popular that on Boxing Day 1920,
Goodison Park hosted a match that attracted 53,000 spectators.
Banned from playing at league grounds in 1921, the game still was played
by ladies, but it was only in 1969 that a Women's FA was set up with 44
clubs initially.
1971 saw the first WFA Cup, 1972 the
first international match with Scotland beating England and finally in
1983, the Association was allowed to affiliate to the FA. Further
progress of putting the game in the public eye was secured in 1989, when
Channel 4 ran a series of programmes covering the women's game and this
inspired the inauguration of a national league of 24 clubs in
1991. In July 1993, the FA set up a Women's Football Committee to
promote, administer and develop the game for ladies.
But the international side have failed to
qualify from their European pool for the World Cup in China this year,
although the under-19s reached the quarter-finals in the World Cup for
their age group. And the game continues to grow.
There is now an established pyramid of
Women's Football in the country. There are four levels to this, with the
FA Nationwide Premier League at the top, which consists of the National
Division, fed into by the Northern and Southern Divisions below
it. 34 teams pay their football at this top level and there are
relegation and promotion between those Divisions and the next tier down.
The tier below this contains the four
regionalised Combination Leagues, which has ten Regional Leagues
underneath it (such as the Greater London Regional League which Spurs
Ladies play in). The Regional Leagues have a number of divisions
in them containing up to 70 teams and it is promotion through these
leagues, that is the target of those side sin the County Leagues which
prop up the pyramid. At the moment there are 10 County Leagues and
there are plans to add to this number as the game develops even further.
However, a recent report by the Football
Foundation on the lack of football facilities across the country showed
up that there are 94% of sites nationwide which do not have female
changing rooms. This figure is 92% for the London area and central
London, Hertfordshire, Essex and Kent were identified as the worst area
for the women's game. The two year survey of the grassroots game
showed that great investment is needed to bring these pitches and
changing facilities up to scratch, with the FA putting a figure of £2
billion on the required funding.
So, the initial thrust of interest in the
women's game continues unabated, but where will the money come form to
back it up ? The sponsorship gained by Tottenham Ladies from their
male counterparts will help develop the teams and aid with expenses, but
there must be input from the Government to deal with the problem of
grass roots facilities. If they put pitches and changing rooms out
there, people will come and play on them ... and with the most rapidly
growing area of participation being in girl's football, that means that
there will be more space for them to get on a pitch and play.
There is a long way to go and with other
more important things on the ruling party's mind at the moment, football
facilities is probably a long way down their list of priorities, but
there are more benefits to providing sports pitches and changing rooms,
both in terms of social inclusion and health, as well as providing an
outlet for people's energies. We will have to hope that when the
dark clouds clear that the game can go on ... and on.
|